kin: auto-commit after pipeline

agents/prompts/cto_advisor.md

@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+You are a CTO Advisor for the Kin multi-agent orchestrator.
+
+Your job: evaluate an architectural plan from a strategic CTO perspective — business risks, scalability, platform vs product complexity — and issue a recommendation. No code changes, analysis only.
+
+## Input
+
+You receive:
+- PROJECT: id, name, path, tech stack
+- TASK: id, title, brief describing the feature or change under review
+- DECISIONS: known conventions and gotchas for this project
+- PREVIOUS STEP OUTPUT: architect plan (required) or department head output with context_packet
+
+## Working Mode
+
+0. If PREVIOUS STEP OUTPUT contains a `context_packet` field — read it FIRST before opening any files. It contains essential handoff context from the prior agent.
+1. Read `DESIGN.md` and `agents/specialists.yaml` to understand the current architecture and project constraints.
+2. Read the architectural plan from PREVIOUS STEP OUTPUT — focus on fields: `implementation_steps`, `schema_changes`, `affected_modules`. If no architectural plan is present in PREVIOUS STEP OUTPUT, return blocked immediately.
+3. For each architectural decision, evaluate across three axes:
+   - **Business risks** — what could go wrong from a product/business standpoint
+   - **Scalability** — horizontal scaling ability, bottlenecks, single points of failure
+   - **Platform vs Product complexity** — does this solution introduce platform-level abstraction for a product-level problem?
+4. For each identified risk, assign severity using these definitions:
+   - `critical` — blocks launch; the system cannot go live without resolving this
+   - `high` — blocks deploy; must be resolved before production release
+   - `medium` — flagged with conditions; acceptable if mitigation is applied
+   - `low` — note only; acceptable as-is, worth monitoring
+5. Issue a strategic verdict:
+   - `approved` — no critical or high risks found; safe to proceed
+   - `concerns` — medium risks present or tradeoffs worth escalating; proceed with awareness
+   - `critical_concerns` — one or more critical or high risks found; do not proceed without resolution
+
+## Focus On
+
+- `platform_vs_product`: always evaluate and state explicitly — even if the answer is "product" (correct level), the field is REQUIRED. This distinguishes over-engineered solutions from appropriately scoped ones.
+- Scalability score 1–5: 1 = single node, no growth path; 5 = horizontally scalable, stateless, distributed-ready.
+- Severity calibration: reserve `critical` for launch-blocking issues (data loss, security hole, core failure mode). Do not inflate severity — it degrades signal quality.
+- Business risk specificity: avoid generic formulations like "might break". Name the concrete failure scenario and its business impact.
+- `strategic_verdict = approved` requires: zero critical risks AND zero high risks. Any high risk → at minimum `concerns`.
+
+## Quality Checks
+
+- `scalability_assessment` is present with all 4 sub-fields: `score`, `notes`, `platform_vs_product`, `complexity_appropriateness`
+- `strategic_risks` is an array; each element has `risk`, `severity`, and `mitigation`
+- `strategic_verdict` is exactly one of: `approved`, `concerns`, `critical_concerns`
+- `recommendation` is a concrete actionable string, not a summary of the risks already listed
+- `platform_vs_product` is explicitly set — never omitted even when the answer is `product`
+- No code is written, no files are modified — output is analysis only
+
+## Return Format
+
+Return ONLY valid JSON (no markdown, no explanation):
+
+```json
+{
+  "status": "done",
+  "scalability_assessment": {
+    "score": 3,
+    "notes": "Single SQLite instance creates a write bottleneck beyond ~100 concurrent users",
+    "platform_vs_product": "product",
+    "complexity_appropriateness": "appropriate"
+  },
+  "strategic_risks": [
+    {
+      "risk": "No rollback plan for DB schema migration",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "mitigation": "Add pg_dump backup step + blue-green deployment before ALTER TABLE runs"
+    }
+  ],
+  "strategic_verdict": "concerns",
+  "recommendation": "Proceed after adding a DB backup and rollback procedure to the deployment runbook. No architectural changes required.",
+  "notes": "If user growth exceeds 500 DAU within 6 months, revisit SQLite → PostgreSQL migration plan."
+}
+```
+
+Valid values for `status`: `"done"`, `"partial"`, `"blocked"`.
+
+- `"partial"` — analysis completed with limited data; include `"partial_reason": "..."`.
+- `"blocked"` — unable to proceed; include `"reason": "..."` and `"blocked_at": "<ISO-8601 datetime>"`.
+
+## Constraints
+
+- Do NOT write or modify any files — produce analysis and recommendations only
+- Do NOT implement code — strategic assessment output only
+- Do NOT evaluate without reading the architectural plan first
+- Do NOT return `strategic_verdict: approved` if any critical or high severity risk is present
+- Do NOT omit `platform_vs_product` — it is required even when the answer is `product`
+- Do NOT add new Python dependencies, modify DB schema, or touch frontend files
+
+## Blocked Protocol
+
+If you cannot perform the task (no architectural plan in PREVIOUS STEP OUTPUT, no file access, ambiguous requirements, task outside your scope), return this JSON **instead of** the normal output:
+
+```json
+{"status": "blocked", "reason": "<clear explanation>", "blocked_at": "<ISO-8601 datetime>"}
+```
+
+Use current datetime for `blocked_at`. Do NOT guess or partially complete — return blocked immediately.

agents/specialists.yaml

@@ -272,6 +272,23 @@ specialists:
       model_recommendation: "{ recommended_model: string, rationale: string, alternatives: array of { model, tradeoffs } }"
       notes: string
 
+  cto_advisor:
+    name: "CTO Advisor"
+    model: opus
+    tools: [Read, Grep, Glob]
+    description: "Strategic technical reviewer: evaluates architectural plans for business risks, scalability, and platform vs product complexity. Analysis-only — no code changes. See also: constitutional_validator (alignment gate), architect (plan author)."
+    permissions: read_only
+    context_rules:
+      decisions: all
+      modules: all
+    output_schema:
+      status: "done | partial | blocked"
+      scalability_assessment: "{ score: 1-5, notes: string, platform_vs_product: platform|product|hybrid, complexity_appropriateness: appropriate|over-engineered|under-engineered }"
+      strategic_risks: "array of { risk: string, severity: critical|high|medium|low, mitigation: string }"
+      strategic_verdict: "approved | concerns | critical_concerns"
+      recommendation: "string — final strategic recommendation"
+      notes: string
+
   knowledge_synthesizer:
     name: "Knowledge Synthesizer"
     model: sonnet

tests/test_kin_docs_002_regression.py

@@ -115,11 +115,11 @@ class TestAllPromptsContainStandardStructure:
 class TestPromptCount:
     """Проверяет, что число промптов не изменилось неожиданно."""
 
-    def test_prompt_count_is_28(self):
+    def test_prompt_count_is_29(self):
-        """В agents/prompts/ ровно 28 файлов .md."""
+        """В agents/prompts/ ровно 29 файлов .md."""
         count = len(_prompt_files())
-        assert count == 28, (  # 28 промптов — актуально на 2026-03-19, +repo_researcher (KIN-DOCS-006, см. git log agents/prompts/)
+        assert count == 29, (  # 29 промптов — актуально на 2026-03-19, +cto_advisor (KIN-DOCS-007, см. git log agents/prompts/)
-            f"Ожидалось 28 промптов, найдено {count}. "
+            f"Ожидалось 29 промптов, найдено {count}. "
             "Если добавлен новый промпт — обнови этот тест."
         )
 

tests/test_kin_docs_007_regression.py

@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+"""Regression tests for KIN-DOCS-007 — cto_advisor: strategic technical reviewer.
+
+Acceptance criteria:
+1. cto_advisor зарегистрирован в specialists.yaml с model=opus
+2. cto_advisor имеет permissions=read_only
+3. output_schema содержит поля: status, scalability_assessment, strategic_risks,
+   strategic_verdict, recommendation, notes
+4. agents/prompts/cto_advisor.md существует и содержит все 5 стандартных секций
+5. Промпт содержит поля выходной схемы: scalability_assessment, strategic_verdict
+6. Промпт содержит Blocked Protocol (blocked_at)
+7. cto_advisor НЕ входит ни в один department workers (опциональный специалист)
+"""
+
+from pathlib import Path
+
+import pytest
+import yaml
+
+
+SPECIALISTS_YAML = Path(__file__).parent.parent / "agents" / "specialists.yaml"
+PROMPTS_DIR = Path(__file__).parent.parent / "agents" / "prompts"
+CTO_ADVISOR_PROMPT = PROMPTS_DIR / "cto_advisor.md"
+
+REQUIRED_SECTIONS = [
+    "## Working Mode",
+    "## Focus On",
+    "## Quality Checks",
+    "## Return Format",
+    "## Constraints",
+]
+
+CTO_ADVISOR_REQUIRED_SCHEMA_FIELDS = {
+    "status",
+    "scalability_assessment",
+    "strategic_risks",
+    "strategic_verdict",
+    "recommendation",
+    "notes",
+}
+
+
+def _load_yaml():
+    return yaml.safe_load(SPECIALISTS_YAML.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
+
+
+# ===========================================================================
+# 1. cto_advisor — регистрация в specialists.yaml
+# ===========================================================================
+
+class TestCtoAdvisorSpecialistsEntry:
+    """cto_advisor зарегистрирован в specialists.yaml с корректной базовой структурой."""
+
+    def test_cto_advisor_exists_in_specialists(self):
+        """cto_advisor присутствует в секции specialists."""
+        data = _load_yaml()
+        assert "cto_advisor" in data.get("specialists", {}), (
+            "cto_advisor отсутствует в specialists.yaml"
+        )
+
+    def test_cto_advisor_model_is_opus(self):
+        """cto_advisor использует модель opus (стратегический ревьюер требует Opus)."""
+        data = _load_yaml()
+        role = data["specialists"]["cto_advisor"]
+        assert role.get("model") == "opus", (
+            f"Ожидался model=opus, получили: {role.get('model')}"
+        )
+
+    def test_cto_advisor_permissions_is_read_only(self):
+        """cto_advisor имеет permissions=read_only (анализ без изменений)."""
+        data = _load_yaml()
+        role = data["specialists"]["cto_advisor"]
+        assert role.get("permissions") == "read_only", (
+            f"Ожидался permissions=read_only, получили: {role.get('permissions')}"
+        )
+
+    def test_cto_advisor_tools_include_read_grep_glob(self):
+        """cto_advisor имеет инструменты Read, Grep, Glob."""
+        data = _load_yaml()
+        tools = data["specialists"]["cto_advisor"].get("tools", [])
+        for tool in ("Read", "Grep", "Glob"):
+            assert tool in tools, f"cto_advisor должен иметь инструмент {tool!r}"
+
+    def test_cto_advisor_has_output_schema(self):
+        """cto_advisor имеет поле output_schema."""
+        data = _load_yaml()
+        role = data["specialists"]["cto_advisor"]
+        assert "output_schema" in role, "cto_advisor должен иметь output_schema"
+
+
+# ===========================================================================
+# 2. cto_advisor — output_schema поля
+# ===========================================================================
+
+class TestCtoAdvisorOutputSchemaFields:
+    """output_schema cto_advisor содержит все обязательные поля."""
+
+    @pytest.mark.parametrize("required_field", sorted(CTO_ADVISOR_REQUIRED_SCHEMA_FIELDS))
+    def test_output_schema_contains_required_field(self, required_field):
+        """output_schema cto_advisor содержит обязательное поле."""
+        data = _load_yaml()
+        schema = data["specialists"]["cto_advisor"]["output_schema"]
+        assert required_field in schema, (
+            f"output_schema cto_advisor обязана содержать поле {required_field!r}"
+        )
+
+
+# ===========================================================================
+# 3. cto_advisor — промпт существует и имеет стандартную структуру
+# ===========================================================================
+
+class TestCtoAdvisorPromptStructure:
+    """agents/prompts/cto_advisor.md существует и содержит все 5 стандартных секций."""
+
+    def test_prompt_file_exists(self):
+        """Файл agents/prompts/cto_advisor.md существует."""
+        assert CTO_ADVISOR_PROMPT.exists(), (
+            f"Промпт cto_advisor не найден: {CTO_ADVISOR_PROMPT}"
+        )
+
+    def test_prompt_file_is_not_empty(self):
+        """Файл cto_advisor.md не пустой."""
+        content = CTO_ADVISOR_PROMPT.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+        assert len(content.strip()) > 100
+
+    @pytest.mark.parametrize("section", REQUIRED_SECTIONS)
+    def test_prompt_has_required_section(self, section):
+        """Промпт cto_advisor.md содержит каждую из 5 стандартных секций."""
+        content = CTO_ADVISOR_PROMPT.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+        assert section in content, (
+            f"cto_advisor.md не содержит обязательную секцию {section!r}"
+        )
+
+    def test_prompt_sections_in_correct_order(self):
+        """5 обязательных секций расположены в правильном порядке."""
+        content = CTO_ADVISOR_PROMPT.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+        positions = [content.find(sec) for sec in REQUIRED_SECTIONS]
+        assert all(p != -1 for p in positions), "Не все 5 секций найдены в cto_advisor.md"
+        assert positions == sorted(positions), (
+            f"Секции в cto_advisor.md расположены не по порядку. "
+            f"Позиции: {dict(zip(REQUIRED_SECTIONS, positions))}"
+        )
+
+    def test_prompt_has_input_section(self):
+        """Промпт cto_advisor.md содержит секцию ## Input."""
+        content = CTO_ADVISOR_PROMPT.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+        assert "## Input" in content, "cto_advisor.md не содержит секцию '## Input'"
+
+    def test_prompt_contains_blocked_protocol(self):
+        """Промпт cto_advisor.md содержит Blocked Protocol."""
+        content = CTO_ADVISOR_PROMPT.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+        assert "blocked_at" in content, (
+            "cto_advisor.md не содержит 'blocked_at' — Blocked Protocol обязателен"
+        )
+
+
+# ===========================================================================
+# 4. cto_advisor — специфические поля выходной схемы в промпте
+# ===========================================================================
+
+class TestCtoAdvisorPromptOutputFields:
+    """Промпт cto_advisor.md определяет ключевые поля стратегической оценки."""
+
+    def test_prompt_defines_scalability_assessment(self):
+        """Промпт определяет поле 'scalability_assessment'."""
+        content = CTO_ADVISOR_PROMPT.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+        assert "scalability_assessment" in content, (
+            "cto_advisor.md должен определять поле 'scalability_assessment'"
+        )
+
+    def test_prompt_defines_strategic_verdict(self):
+        """Промпт определяет поле 'strategic_verdict'."""
+        content = CTO_ADVISOR_PROMPT.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+        assert "strategic_verdict" in content, (
+            "cto_advisor.md должен определять поле 'strategic_verdict'"
+        )
+
+    def test_prompt_defines_strategic_risks(self):
+        """Промпт определяет поле 'strategic_risks'."""
+        content = CTO_ADVISOR_PROMPT.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+        assert "strategic_risks" in content, (
+            "cto_advisor.md должен определять поле 'strategic_risks'"
+        )
+
+    def test_prompt_defines_platform_vs_product(self):
+        """Промпт явно упоминает platform_vs_product."""
+        content = CTO_ADVISOR_PROMPT.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+        assert "platform_vs_product" in content, (
+            "cto_advisor.md должен упоминать поле 'platform_vs_product'"
+        )
+
+
+# ===========================================================================
+# 5. cto_advisor НЕ входит в department workers
+# ===========================================================================
+
+class TestCtoAdvisorNotInDepartments:
+    """cto_advisor является опциональным специалистом — не входит в departments."""
+
+    def test_cto_advisor_not_in_any_department_workers(self):
+        """cto_advisor не является обязательным членом ни одного департамента."""
+        data = _load_yaml()
+        for dept_name, dept in data.get("departments", {}).items():
+            workers = dept.get("workers", [])
+            assert "cto_advisor" not in workers, (
+                f"cto_advisor не должен быть в workers департамента '{dept_name}'. "
+                "cto_advisor — опциональный стратегический ревьюер, не постоянный участник."
+            )